Yes, that Holden, and that Naruto. Because I can.
For any of you not all that in with the world of anime blogs, the latest craze is trying to compare The Catcher in the Rye to anime stuff.
Catcher is about this guy Holden, and when I heard the people talk about it (and boy did I hear them talk), I heard a lot of this “Holden” talk. First name terms, our mate Holden. Generations of youths relating to him, an enduring friend to the adolsecent. Of course, when I finally read it, it was the authority of the literary cannon more than this idea of this “Holden” which prompted me. But I still expected to in some way relate.
And so I started the book, and boy did he piss me off. Maybe I was a few years too old to be meeting him, but I was overcome with a sense of surprise that so many people could actually sympathise with this vile little tosspot. That this was the 50s countercultural icon, the outsider as teenager. And then, because he actually was (is?) a good writer, Salinger won me round, and got me in touch with the humanity of his creation.
That’s my enduring memory of the book – being made to feel like I understood a wanker, and maybe not wanting to call him names so much. And being made to do so by being given a guided tour of his dealings which showed what he was like behind the bullshit. Because really, most people are wankers, but that doesn’t mean we have to hate everybody.
So, why fucking Naruto. Just because I woke up feeling like a wanker today? Well, yes. But anyway. Naruto (the show) also succeeds in making me fond of a guy I didn’t exactly feel drawn to. So let’s just go over the obvious faults. He’s dumb, loud, obnoxious, naive.
And how do we come to like him? Well, for a start, he’s an underdog, a contrast to smug Sasuke. He also doesn’t get the girl, which can only help. If I was irritated, I didn’t feel at all revolted, the plot made this loudmouth as sympathetic as it could.
But he also turns out to be heroic. Like most people who enjoyed the show, I feel fondly for the period when Naruto was above all an inspiration. When he wasn’t the super-powerhouse type, when he was a promising kid with the right attitude. He did the right thing, never gave up and all that – and merely doing that made the world better, made him a hero. And it’s this understanding on the part of the audience which sees us forgive Naruto his loudness, because we see that it’s just a part of how he becomes a hero to his friends.
My comparison is based in two stories which set out to reveal protagonists, and so change our views of them. Salinger did it by trying to show us Holden’s, for want of a better word, soul. That feeling of getting to see the heart of a person kind of parallels the role of Naruto as hero. We see a “true” person beneath the façade, the bit of the character that matters. But what we see in a person’s soul, what it is that matters in these two worlds, is very different.
Thing is, the boy Holden has his little dream – and it’s vague, impossible. It’s egotistical (who catches the catchmen?) but basically kind, a very human combination. It doesn’t make him a good person, but it puts us in touch with him. Naruto’s dream is completely egotistical (perhaps excusably so). But it’s also concrete, and in seeking it he takes on a way of living which genuinely does make him a good person.
Thing is, being so amazing, Naruto’s inner life is incredible. Revealing the mind of Holden above all means making him more human. Revealing Naruto pulls us away from his foibles, and makes him extraordinary.
You get two different sorts of soul. Salinger’s soul is a deep rooted common humanity. In Naruto it’s an equally deep rooted capacity for a person to become almost mythically immense. Relating to people who share a mental core, or relating to those who share a great potential. Somehow I’m able to feel for both views of humanity. Perhaps the key to the view of the soul is the starting position. If a person is a wanker it matters that we can come and see them as kind. If a person is a fool it matters that we can come to see them as incredible. When we say we “relate” perhaps we just accept that a person is more than the simple picture in our heads.
To wrap it up. Holden is always going to be a wanker, but Catcher lets us accept people despite their faults. Naruto was never a wanker, but his show invites us to overlook his irritations because of his virtues. Coburn may well be a wanker, but wait till you see his phony bunshin no jutsu human pyramid cannon – you won’t relate, but it sure is impressive.



[...] coburn (Naruto) [...]
By: Baka-Raptor » Blog Archive » The ShizNat in the Rye on August 1, 2008
at 7:12 pm
I absolutely disliked Holden’s hypocrisy. But of course, as I was given an insight to his internal workings, I became more sympathetic to him.
The comparison is a great one in the fact that the protagonists in both media are elevated beyond what is normally perceived of them when we are introduced to their inner worlds.
I like Holden despite his being a wanker. It’s probably because, as you said, I got to know him more.
By: Michael on August 1, 2008
at 7:18 pm
Ah I like this relation
By: RyanA on August 1, 2008
at 7:36 pm
You put together a comparison that makes sense, which is more than I was able to do.
I must be prone to holding grudges, as by the time the novel offered me a chance to come to like Holden I was so fed up with him that I couldn’t feel any pity or understanding.
Naruto I can’t comment on, but nice work on the Nadesico screencap – made me chuckle.
By: The Animanachronism on August 1, 2008
at 9:48 pm
[...] coburn (Naruto) [...]
By: Baka-Raptor on August 2, 2008
at 4:54 am
M: I think my problems with Holden really went beyond the hypocrisy and into the realms of irrational disgust – so sympathy was only half the cure. Not quite sure why I feel that, but it’s probably what stopped me from ever really thinking of him in the way a lot of people seem to.
The gap between initial perceptions and understanding is right. Though I suppose with Holden we have his inner voice as deceptive, and with Naruto it’s an external bravado which he has to be elevated beyond.
R: Await my full published works: The Complete Dictionary of English Literature as a Naruto Rip-Off. The Wife of Bath is blatantly poetic fanservice.
A: For all my Holden hostility I did find the whole catcher sequence very affecting – and was probably propelled into sympathy by pure verve on the part of Salinger as much as anything to do with Caulfield’s character.
Sadly I didn’t manage to read your post properly, as I don’t know Welcome to the NHK. But when in doubt I just fall back on shonen articles. And since the Jovians turned up for real Nadesico has suddenly levelled up impressively.
By: coburn on August 2, 2008
at 11:26 am
[...] book I’ve read’; coburn writes on (his title says it all, really) ‘Holden, Naruto, and being a wanker‘; and berkles draws a connection between Holden and Larry Davi- wait, what does Curb Your [...]
By: Need The Warld Ken About My Ramblings? « The Animanachronism on August 4, 2008
at 12:49 pm
[...] (2) I feel guilty. Having originally agreed to write about Catcher, I then proceeded to procrastinate perpetually. Perhaps two other people may laugh at the lesser-litterateur that I am (oh wait, I meant three now four, five, six [...]
By: [LWC 54] Misanthropic Sororiphilia, Non-Fictional Lacrimalation « Calamitous Intent on August 15, 2008
at 2:34 am