“a sound soul resides within sound mind and sound body” (Tadashi)
“a healthy soul, resides in a healthy mind and a healthy body” (Rumbel)
Before I proceed to ramble on pretensiously about the themes of a slick anime thrillride, let’s get some basics out of the way. Action series have meaning – not just in the minds of their self-centred viewers, but in their implicit worldview. If we look at the up-front motivational maxims which tend to reside within these shonen combat shows, it becomes apparent that different productions have different nuances. Take the idea that Soul Eater lacks the dynamic anti-authoritarian edge. What beliefs Soul Eater does offer the viewer are becoming more apparent as the show goes on.
Maybe these ideological factors don’t really decide why the show is good – which could be pretty much boiled down to having much interesting art, a solid narrative formula, BONES with a budget, great music. I’m on about about what Soul Eater is. Of course the reason that I care what it is would be because it’s so awesomely excellent at brilliance. It would be rather presumptuous of me to claim it as the best show of the still ongoing anime season, so whilst I’m doing that, I’ll go the whole hog: Soul Eater is the show of the year. (And even if it isn’t the best show of the year, it’ll probably define the year in anime for me as much as anything else will, by sheer length at the very least)
Soul Eater’s coolness can be tricky to write about. I was wondering a couple of weeks back if it was just too snarkyily self aware to have any accessible subtexts. But after a gorgeous but slightly dramatically blank introductory period the series gets progressively better about displaying its intents. So, for the following, spoilers through eps 1-11 will crop up.
Back to that quote I opened with – on the house of the sound soul. Doesn’t that really say everything about the ideal represented by so many of our heroes? To want to be right, healthy, a unified person every way. In comparison to the repeated thematic statement which preceded episodes of Fullmetal Alchemist, that introductory maxim might seem rather lightweight. But the simple ideal grows ever more resonant.
The idea of resonance is pretty much what Soul Eater has to offer. Lots of these fighting shows are really about companionship. Soul Eater stands in contrast to what I think of as the the democratic approach to combat. You know the deal, “the spirit of the team wills me on, I am the chosen face, the avatar of my social group – with them behind me I can do it all”. Soul Eater is more personal than that, about perfect partnerships as the amplifier of power. Partnership is about more than friendship and common purpose, it’s about trust and the will to put your life in somebody elses hands, even if they’re rather ridiculous.
To take an example, as Tsubaki prepares to fight her brother, Black Star (a widely loathed character, who has been closely involved with many of the best bits of Soul Eater) stops her from forcing herself to explain, and just commits. It’s a total faith which contrasts to that of Maka, who’s (understandingly) afraid to put Soul’s life on the line. What’s the lesson here, to be like the blue haired nut, to be a fool? Patty laughs maniacly at Death the Kids foibles – but she’s lethal when needed. Is this a celebration of being irrational, is that needed to have total faith in a person? Presumably what the series will show us is the rather more restrained Maka learning how to make the same commitment – to become like the more cartoony characters in this cartoon. That’s what resonance signifies, it’s more than just never-say-die, it’s faith.
And isn’t that cool? Not to believe in a romantic idea of friendship per se (SoulxBlack Star), or in great organisations, but in the very essence of another human being. Sure you could be wrong about them, and you can only go so far with the powers of two people, they’re only human and all. But it’s still glorious. Glorious in a way that those who “sell out”, who destroy individuality in becoming mighty demons, can’t be. It’s a glory only accessible to those who are “healthy”.
It’s a sign of the ideological coherence of Soul Eater that, in her personal showdown, Tsubaki apparently looses the fight, is left impaled and bleeding without laying a scratch on her opponent. That even though she’s gifted and determined and right, she isn’t magically made stronger. She takes the blow, she bleeds out, and her victory is in showing her brother what it is that lies behind her silence – and making him renounce his corrupted soul. It’s the clearest sign yet that Soul Eater can offer a Gurren-Lagannish combination of the stunningly exciting and the manly-tearesque.
So then, health. Is a healthy mind just a social one? What we know it isn’t, which would be a mind like Medusa’s. She couldn’t be much less healthy minded without entering some stage of undress. She’s a witch doctor with a doctorate, a genuine physician with a broomstick in the cupboard, a snake on her arm, and a grin like a smug cadaver. But, on the other hand, a hero like Stein is a wee bit nuts too – so a healthy mind isn’t a conformist one, it’s a moral one. Morality is in self-sufficiency, it’s in faith, it’s in selflessness.
That morality is based in a personal unity suggested by unity of body and soul. Not to be interested in consuming souls, but in knowing and being your best self – certainty, reliability. Not to use others but to resonate with one other. And yes, this is an idea we’ll all have often encountered elsewhere in one form or another. But in Soul Eater the focus is on partnership as the acme of soundness.
It’s probably best demonstrated by Masamune. In contrast to not-villains like Stein, characterless one-off villains like the Pharoh, and pathetic anti-villains like Chrona, he really gets the point across. Masamune consumed others, and he’s the clearest vision so far of a man gone wrong by degrees – misreading the world and his place in it. Masamune shows us the dark side with clarity, and shows us that the essence of a person lies in their relations and in finding a stable role. I’d agree then, that at its heart Soul Eater is not rebellious – the rebel in Soul Eater is self-centered, neurotic and unsound.
This ain’t complex, it isn’t very deep. But it is an approach with an internal coherence. Sound thinking backed by magnificent visuals, good music, fun comedy, distinctive style. And what’s more, Soul Eater still has space to move into – how will Maka learn? how does transforming into a monster progress? what motivates Medusa? what of witches in general? These aren’t just plot spaces in a killer action show, they’re opportunities to further that core belief which Soul Eater carries. A belief in the sound individual, in a heroism based in selflessness and partnership.



I’ve been trying to avoid taking my over-analytical approach to SE since it’s quite clearly meant to be cool-as-hell fun through and through but the underlying themes you pointed out here are, despite being straightforward, quite profound.
Perhaps it’s because I’ve just come off finishing Eureka Seven that I’m mentally geared towards trying to find romantic subtexts…unfortunately for me, that isn’t what SE is all about right now. The bond between technician and weapon in Maka’s and Soul’s case is less sentimental and more practical – when their souls are in sync they work together to great effect.
I’m in two minds about their relationship though – it’s fine as it is but if the more ’sentimental’ aspects were explored again (such as Maka’s reluctance to place Soul in the way of Ragnarok) I don’t know whether it would fare quite so well. It all depends on the writing I suppose.
I’m looking forward to 10 and 11 now though – after some Maka/Soul action it’ll be cool to see Tsubaki and Black Star in combat (even though Black Star annoys me immensely). Rumbel don’t seem to have got that far yet, but I like their presentation.
By: concretebadger on June 19, 2008
at 10:04 pm
I think the intent of the animator is of any concern here, really: whether they were thinking the same thoughts as Coburn and had been planning out the ideological framework of Soul Eater ever since the start of the manga is irrelevant because the product they produce embodies those values quite well – thus the “overanalysis” we produce is true. Basically we’re telling the animators what they really meant; and I think that is quite possible.
Alas, me, afraid of starting the journey of a 51 episode series, just didn’t. Perhaps I should have stuck with it? I couldn’t get past the exterior, nor could I [didn't even really attempt at] see any resonance between it the milestones TTGL established a year ago.
By: lelangir on June 20, 2008
at 2:00 pm
CB: Invariably my tendency to ramble on about a series has as much or more to do with how much I enjoy watching as it does with the actual content. It’s an involuntary response.
The (non) romance is an interesting aspect of the shows ideals. I wonder if the partnerships of Soul Eater are actually the ultimate fighting show romance – sexless comradeship as the best relationship. Of course they’re still set up in boy/girl teams, which means the cast are largely “spoken for”, and there’s little space for romantic tension (nosebleeds aside).
The sentimental side is building up though, it takes time but I reckon it’s there. I kind of assume that everything in the show will turn out for the best. Above all else Soul Eater seems to be going from strength to strength – with serious plot work on eps7-8, comedy on 9, and much win in 10-11.
——————–
L: Naturally I’d be happy should the series proceed to back up all the things I manage to read into it. I doubt it’s really got Gurren-Lagann style ideological aims, but I think it’s comparable in terms of excitement and drama. I don’t think it intends to speak to the viewer in quite the same way, but happily I think that the worldview/ideology of the writer seems to be internally coherent so far (which = Good Thing, and if that goes on being the case then, I agree, any original intent is irrelevant).
Anyway, I’ll still be happy if I’m completely wrong about its true ideals, because the show pushes my happiness buttons with such pleasing regularity. Don’t see why it’d ever be necessary to force yourself to watch it, since it’s got nothing too deep to say so far. But for those who like some persistently ongoing weekly scythesauce it’s nice that the dramatic side is as nicely arranged as the fighting is.
By: coburn on June 20, 2008
at 2:06 pm
Funny you should link that post as an example of Soul Eater being tricky to write about–I watched 10 and 11 recently, and nearly blogged about 11 (but didn’t, because of time constraints and only having a vague idea of what to say). I think Soul Eater has been like many other shounen series to date: they have a slow, sometimes achingly slow, and sometimes boring start to them, but if you give the series time, generally speaking, they’ll come around and knock you upside the head like 10/11 did for me. The humorous bits of 10/11 were actually kind of annoying to me, as I found the drama of what was actually happening quite engaging, and the humor only served to break the tension in a most unwelcome way.
If the series keeps up with this level of…whatever it was that made 10/11 particularly engaging for me, as I suspect it will be, then Soul Eater will probably go from being a “really cool” series to being one that is both “really cool” and “really good”. Or something.
By: OGT on June 21, 2008
at 6:31 pm
It’s probably the lack of space (per episode) for developing the niceties of character that limits the brilliant in shonen series early on. Perhaps the reason I’m so madly keen on this show is that I’ve enjoyed it even when the stakes have been low.
The only actually jarring humour I recall was the Black Star groin slide (maybe some blood would’ve made that feel more serious). Still, more than enough win all round.
By: coburn on June 21, 2008
at 11:38 pm
Personally I think it is too early to say much about where Soul Eater is heading towards.
Besides that, I really like Excalibur.
By: The Sojourner on June 23, 2008
at 4:12 pm
Ah, but by making premature conclusions I get two shows for the (metaphorical) price of one. By episode 22 I’ll have decided something else – further rewarding me. But even those with divergent tendencies can appreciate the mystical grandeur of the sword of heroes.
By: coburn on June 23, 2008
at 5:33 pm
Black Star is Widely loathed? Are you kidding me? Black Star is my favorite character.
健全なる”魂”は健全なる精神と健全なる肉体に宿る。
By: Troy on July 14, 2008
at 7:25 pm
The impression I got, especially early on in the series, was that Black Star was putting people off with his goofy arrogance and general loudmouthed strongman stylings. A lot of the people who dropped the show seemed to find him irritating. Maybe if I’d been more engaged with the manga fans I’d have found that those more familiar with the story liked him more.
Personally I find it easier to sympathise with less bonkers characters – but am beginning to notice that he’s in most of my favourite bits. Eps 2,9,11+12 in particular need Black Star in order to deliver their considerable levels of win – so I’m getting to like him more and more.
!ӣ$%^&*()_+P{}@>\?
By: coburn on July 14, 2008
at 9:02 pm